<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>woikr &#187; Google</title> <atom:link href="http://woikr.com/category/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://woikr.com</link> <description>Gadgets, Reviews, Tricks and More</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>Dear Google, Y U Spam My Search Results?</title><link>http://woikr.com/google/dear-google-y-u-spam-my-search-results/</link> <comments>http://woikr.com/google/dear-google-y-u-spam-my-search-results/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:54:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Coupon Code Search Results]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Evil Doings]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google Evil]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google search]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google Search Evil]]></category> <category><![CDATA[letsbuy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Letsbuy Saholic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Saholic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Saholic Coupon codes 2012]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Search Engine Spam]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Technology misuse]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://woikr.com/?p=9044</guid> <description><![CDATA[I use Google search a gazillion times a day and love how Google search evolved over the years.. ahem.. Social Search. While I am totally fine with the idea of Search &#34;Featured Ads&#34; as Google’s primary source of money, I am not okay with them tweaking the actual search results for money. See what I [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
align="justify">I use Google search a gazillion times a day and love how Google search evolved over the years.. ahem.. Social Search. While I am totally fine with the idea of Search &quot;Featured Ads&quot; as Google’s primary source of money, I am not okay with them tweaking the actual search results for money.</p><p
align="justify"><a
href="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image.png" rel="lightbox[9044]"><img
style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image_thumb.png" width="401" height="124" /></a></p><p><span
id="more-9044"></span><p
align="justify">See what I found on a casual Google search for the keyword – &quot;<strong><a
href="https://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;q=saholic%20coupon%20codes%202012" target="_blank">saholic coupon codes 2012</a></strong>&quot;. Google appears to be tweaking this &quot;Saholic&quot; related search to show over 90% of LetsBuy related results which are totally irrelevant to the original search query.</p><p
align="justify"><a
href="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image1.png" rel="lightbox[9044]"><img
style="display: inline" title="image" alt="image" src="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image_thumb1.png" width="686" height="716" /></a></p><p
align="justify">At first I thought this might be because of a <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb" target="_blank">Google Bomb</a>. But soon realized that Google <strike>was doing</strike> could be doing this intentionally. Look at the foot note where I &quot;get to&quot; manually click on the link to get the <strong>Saholic</strong> results that I originally was looking for. For readers outside India, Saholic.com and LetsBuy.com are competitive online shopping portals very popular in India. Showing the competitor search result would have direct impact on earnings for the other company (in this case Saholic.com).</p><p
align="justify"><a
href="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image2.png" rel="lightbox[9044]"><img
style="display: inline" title="image" alt="image" src="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/image_thumb2.png" width="618" height="211" /></a></p><p
align="justify">We think this is cheap.. really cheap doing from Google..&#160; Here’s a hat-tip for the companies involved in there..</p><blockquote><p
align="justify"><em><strong>Dear Saholic, Take this up with Google …guys, this’ll hurt your business. </strong></em></p><p
align="justify"><em><strong>Dear LetsBuy, Did you pay for this? If yes, how much?</strong></em></p><p
align="justify"><em><strong>Dear Google, I am really pissed off right now that you did this. </strong></em></p></blockquote><p
align="justify">Looks like they&#8217;ve indeed turned on to the dark side. This just adds up to their <a
href="http://blog.mocality.co.ke/2012/01/13/google-what-were-you-thinking/" target="_blank">first</a> and <a
href="http://opengeodata.org/google-ip-vandalizing-openstreetmap" target="_blank">second</a> such evil-doings from the recent past.</p><p
align="justify"><strong>[UPDATE 1 -&#160; 22nd March 11:00AM] – </strong>Some commentors on the <a
href="http://www.reddit.com/r/google/comments/r6nf0/dear_google_y_u_spam_my_search_results/" target="_blank">Reddit post</a> believe that this could be a &quot;false positive&quot; that Google thinks LetsBuy and Saholic are &quot;related terms&quot; when they really aren&#8217;t. We hope that this issue is fixed soon.</p><p><strong>[UPDATE 2 - 4th April 11:00AM] </strong>– It seems there are other such <a
href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/111588754935244257268/posts/iLnVLmNyBGK" target="_blank">false positives</a> due to possible bug in Google&#8217;s Ranking algorithms.&#160; <a
href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/query-synonyms" target="_blank">Google sees</a> a strong relationship between these two keywords (&#8216;Saholic&#8217; and &#8216;LetsBuy&#8217; here) to think they are synonyms. Thanks <a
href="https://twitter.com/#!/sitakanta" target="_blank">@sitakanta</a> for pointing us to these links.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://woikr.com/google/dear-google-y-u-spam-my-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google offering free WiFi to access Google+ in India [Desperation?]</title><link>http://woikr.com/google/google-offering-free-wifi-to-access-google-in-india-desperation/</link> <comments>http://woikr.com/google/google-offering-free-wifi-to-access-google-in-india-desperation/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:55:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Setu</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google free wifi]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google india]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google Plus]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://woikr.com/?p=8876</guid> <description><![CDATA[Looks like Google is desperate to get Indians to start using Google+ as their primary social network. Google India has partnered with O-Zone to offer free access to Google+ wherever O-Zone has their hotspots (list includes CCDs, McDonalds, Costa Coffee etc. Complete List). Although anything free is good for customers, this move sounds more like [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: justify;"><img
title="GooglePlus_thumb.png" src="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/GooglePlus_thumb.png" border="0" alt="GooglePlus_thumb.png" /></p><p
style="text-align: justify;">Looks like Google is desperate to get Indians to start using Google+ as their primary social network. Google India has partnered with O-Zone to offer free access to Google+ wherever O-Zone has their hotspots (list includes CCDs, McDonalds, Costa Coffee etc. <a
href="http://www.ozonewifi.com/hotspots.aspx">Complete List</a>).</p><p
style="text-align: justify;">Although anything free is good for customers, this move sounds more like a desperate attempt by Google. India is one of the top users of Facebook and it looks like Google wants a share of that pie. This is probably the perfect time to refresh the <a
href="http://woikr.com/internet/hilarious-video-on-google-plus-by-college-humor/">College Humor&#8217;s hilarious video on Google Plus</a>:</p><p
style="text-align: justify;"> <object
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://1.static.collegehumor.cvcdn.com/moogaloop/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6611967&amp;use_node_id=true&amp;fullscreen=1" width="600" height="338"><param
name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param
name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param
name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param
name="movie" value="http://1.static.collegehumor.cvcdn.com/moogaloop/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6611967&amp;use_node_id=true&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="600" height="338" src="http://1.static.collegehumor.cvcdn.com/moogaloop/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6611967&amp;use_node_id=true&amp;fullscreen=1" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p><p>[via <a
href="http://www.pluggd.in/free-internet-access-for-google-plus-users-in-india-297/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pluggd+%28pluGGd.in%29">PluggdIn</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://woikr.com/google/google-offering-free-wifi-to-access-google-in-india-desperation/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google and Samsung announce the Galaxy Nexus</title><link>http://woikr.com/google/google-and-samsung-announce-the-galaxy-nexus/</link> <comments>http://woikr.com/google/google-and-samsung-announce-the-galaxy-nexus/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:19:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Setu</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mobile Phones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[android 4.0]]></category> <category><![CDATA[galaxy nexus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ice Cream Sandwich]]></category> <category><![CDATA[latest google phone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nexus]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://woikr.com/google/google-and-samsung-announce-the-galaxy-nexus/</guid> <description><![CDATA[With probably the lamest concatenated name ever, Google and Samsung have announced the (duh) Galaxy Nexus, the next pure Google phone from Samsung. With Google’s latest Android version 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, the Galaxy Nexus features a lot of cool features and an improved UI. Check out the video: httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-F_ke3rxopc&#38;feature=player_embedded You can check out the [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
title="" alt="google galaxy nexus logo" src="http://www.google.com/nexus/img/content/hdr-introduction.png" /></p><p
align="justify">With probably the lamest concatenated name ever, Google and Samsung have announced the (duh) <a
href="http://www.google.com/nexus/" target="_blank">Galaxy Nexus</a>, the next pure Google phone from Samsung. With Google’s latest Android version 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, the Galaxy Nexus features a lot of cool features and an improved UI. Check out the video:</p><p
align="justify"><a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-F_ke3rxopc&amp;feature=player_embedded">httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-F_ke3rxopc&amp;feature=player_embedded</a></p><p
align="justify">You can check out the phone on the official Google site <a
href="http://www.google.com/nexus/" target="_blank">here</a>. Here is how the phone looks like:</p><p><span
id="more-8708"></span><p><img
title="" alt="google galaxy nexus" src="http://www.google.com/nexus/img/content/introduction.png" /></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://woikr.com/google/google-and-samsung-announce-the-galaxy-nexus/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Dear Google, Please Fix This Chrome Issue</title><link>http://woikr.com/google/dear-google-please-fix-this-chrome-issue/</link> <comments>http://woikr.com/google/dear-google-please-fix-this-chrome-issue/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 02:04:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chirag</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bug in Google Chrome]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chrome bookmarks search]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chrome bookmarks search issue]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quickmarks for Google Chrome]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quickmarks search issue]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://woikr.com/?p=8533</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ever since Google Chrome came out, I liked it for being minimalist and snappy. But once I switched to Mac, it became essential. No browser comes close to Chrome&#8217;s performance on the Mac. No matter how much I like the Full Screen feature on Safari, it just isn&#8217;t enough to make me switch. But this [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: justify;">Ever since Google Chrome came out, I liked it for being minimalist and snappy. But once I switched to Mac, it became essential. No browser comes close to Chrome&#8217;s performance on the Mac. No matter how much I like the Full Screen feature on Safari, it just isn&#8217;t enough to make me switch. But this bookmarks related issue has been driving me crazy.</p><p
style="text-align: justify;">Searching bookmarks using Chrome&#8217;s Omnibar does not work. They <a
href="http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95440">say it does</a> but it doesn&#8217;t.</p><p
style="text-align: justify;"><span
id="more-8533"></span>I&#8217;ll explain the problem a bit more. Amongst these, there are bookmarks that I open regularly like Google Analytics dashboard and my Bank account. These all are filed under different categories and I have give short codes to them like GA, ICICI etc. I expect the Omnibar to show the bookmarks stored so I can directly access them but nope. I don&#8217;t see anything even close.</p><p
style="text-align: justify;"><img
class="size-full wp-image-8534 alignnone" title="chrome_omnibar_bookmarks" src="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/chrome_omnibar_bookmarks.jpg" alt="Chrome Bookmarks Search Does Not Work" width="356" height="288" /></p><p
style="text-align: justify;">I also tried a bookmarks plug-in called Quickmarks that lets me press &#8220;b&#8221; in the Omnibar and search for keywords in bookmarks. It failed as well. Note: I moved GA out of a folder to the front of bookmarks to demonstrate this better.</p><p><img
title="Quickmarks_search" src="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Quickmarks_search.jpg" alt="Quickmarks Search" width="438" height="247" /></p><p
style="text-align: justify;">I don&#8217;t use any social bookmarking services. I bookmark websites in Chrome and it syncs them across my computers. If I discover something interesting on my iPhone, I just send myself an email and add it manually. Now those bookmarks stay hidden but I expect them to show up when I look up keywords in title/Website URL but half the time it doesn&#8217;t.</p><p
style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s really really irritating. Dear Google, please work on fixing this. It&#8217;s search for heaven&#8217;s sake.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://woikr.com/google/dear-google-please-fix-this-chrome-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Apparently, there are some things you can&#8217;t Google</title><link>http://woikr.com/google/apparently-there-are-some-things-you-cant-google/</link> <comments>http://woikr.com/google/apparently-there-are-some-things-you-cant-google/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:49:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chirag</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google banned queries]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google denial of service]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google range search]]></category> <category><![CDATA[weird google results]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://woikr.com/?p=8462</guid> <description><![CDATA[Here something weird. Try Googling &#8220;9999999..99999999999999999999999&#8243;. It tries to load for sometime and then redirects to this strange error page. From what I figured out from a discussion on Hacker News, &#8220;..&#8221; is an operator that is used to denote a range. So if you Google &#8220;1..10&#8243;, it searches for all the numbers from 1 [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: justify;">Here something weird. Try <a
href="http://www.google.com/search?q=9999999..99999999999999999999999" target="_blank">Googling</a> &#8220;9999999..99999999999999999999999&#8243;. It tries to load for sometime and then redirects to this strange error page.</p><p
style="text-align: justify;"><img
title="google_error" src="http://woikr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/google_error.png" alt="" width="439" height="207" /></p><p
style="text-align: justify;"><span
id="more-8462"></span>From what I figured out from a discussion on <a
href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2948873" target="_blank">Hacker News</a>, &#8220;..&#8221; is an operator that is used to denote a range. So if you Google &#8220;1..10&#8243;, it searches for all the numbers from 1 to 10. As you keep increasing this range the query takes more time as the result set grows. After a certain range, it&#8217;s so big that Google refuses to accept it, thinking you are trying to start a <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack" target="_blank"><em>Denial of Service</em> attack</a>.</p><p
style="text-align: justify;">There also are certain range searches for e.g. credit card number range that are also not allowed.</p><p
style="text-align: justify;">If you find a different/better explanation, do leave a comment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://woikr.com/google/apparently-there-are-some-things-you-cant-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 592/592 objects using disk: basic

Served from: woikr.com @ 2012-05-22 05:55:25 -->
